AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-11 Thread Danny Braniss
ng 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2 AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed! panic y/n? [y] FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 6, version: 0x00

Re: AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-12 Thread Doug White
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: > SE7500CW2, this motherboard arrived yesterday, so im not sure if its hardware > or software so while i go and do the regular rounds -rtfm, install MS, etc, > maybe someone can shed some light? Looks like you have a broke CPU. > AP #1 (PH

Re: AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > SE7500CW2, this motherboard arrived yesterday, so im not sure if its hardware > > or software so while i go and do the regular rounds -rtfm, install MS, etc, > > maybe someone can shed so

Re: AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Sep-2002 Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Doug White wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: >> >> > SE7500CW2, this motherboard arrived yesterday, so im not sure if its hardware >> > or software so while i go and do the regular rounds -rtfm, inst

Re: AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-12 Thread Doug Swarin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:58:36PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > > SE7500CW2, this motherboard arrived yesterday, so im not sure if its hardware > > > or software so while i go and do

Re: AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed!

2002-09-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> The method in which we kick the AP's to wake them up might not be quite > right. We have some hacks to handle erratic behavior on older CPU's > (P5's and PentiumPro's) that perhaps the P4 chips don't like. Could > someone with one of these boards try an SMP kernel from current? Peter > has d