Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-18 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Steve Ames wrote: > Hrm... no question that the ATA driver is better today, but its still > not reporting DMA on my Quantum bigfoot drive (which should support DMA: > http://www.quantum.com/products/archive/bigfoot_cy/bigfoot_cy_features.htm) > > The Maxtor is pretty old (Bu

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-17 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
> It seems Nick Hibma wrote: > > > > ata_command: timeout waiting for interrupt > > > > ^^^ > > > > > > Thats an aritifact from the ATAPI probes, it should be of no harm... > > > > In that case, is there some way of getting rid of the message? > > Erhm well, I said harmless, but it ind

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-17 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Nick Hibma wrote: > > > ata_command: timeout waiting for interrupt > > > ^^^ > > > > Thats an aritifact from the ATAPI probes, it should be of no harm... > > In that case, is there some way of getting rid of the message? Erhm well, I said harmless, but it indicates there is a p

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-17 Thread Nick Hibma
> > ata_command: timeout waiting for interrupt > > ^^^ > > Thats an aritifact from the ATAPI probes, it should be of no harm... In that case, is there some way of getting rid of the message? Nick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] USB project

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-16 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Steve Ames wrote: > > > > Both reports "dont care" fields in the ata conformance field > > thereby being set as ATA-0 disks. Since I've put in test > > to only enable WDMA2 on at least ATA-2 disks and only enable > > UDMA2 on at least ATA-3 disks, well your disks are not even > > tried. Y

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-16 Thread Steve Ames
> Drives that report their capabilities right :) > > ad0: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as master > > ad0: 1554MB (3183264 sectors), 3158 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > > ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, PIO > > ad1: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as slave > > ad1: 4134MB (8467200 sectors), 8960 cyls, 15 heads, 63

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-14 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Steve Ames wrote: > > > I've put them in recently to try to avoid runniing DMA on known > > problematic HW, but they will also reject some good ones > > regrettably... > > Hrm... any chance of making that a config option? People should be > allowed to hurt themselves if they want :) Or

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-14 Thread Steve Ames
> > What am I missing? > > Drives that report their capabilities right :) > > ad0: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as master > > ad0: 1554MB (3183264 sectors), 3158 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > > ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, PIO > > ad1: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as slave > > ad1: 4134MB (8467200 sectors

Re: ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-14 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Steve Ames wrote: > > Hrm... no question that the ATA driver is better today, but its still > not reporting DMA on my Quantum bigfoot drive (which should support DMA: > http://www.quantum.com/products/archive/bigfoot_cy/bigfoot_cy_features.htm) > > The Maxtor is pretty old (But its been

ATA w/ today's -CURRENT

1999-12-13 Thread Steve Ames
Hrm... no question that the ATA driver is better today, but its still not reporting DMA on my Quantum bigfoot drive (which should support DMA: http://www.quantum.com/products/archive/bigfoot_cy/bigfoot_cy_features.htm) The Maxtor is pretty old (But its been current since 3.0 :) but may still hav