On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 10:53:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >>
> >>> For UFS/FFS there is noth
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 10:53:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >>
> >>> For UFS/FFS there is not
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>>
>>> For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
>>> It is generally slower to
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>>
>>> For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
>>> It is generally slower to
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> > For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
> > It is generally slower to acces 32k on different HDDs than to acces 64k on
> > one HDD.
>
> It
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> > For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
> > It is generally slower to acces 32k on different HDDs than to acces 64k on
> > one HDD.
>
> I
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer
> PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
>>
>>> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
>>> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
Tensor Perth wrote:
>
> > No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> > stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
> > chances are higher that you can perform th
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:35:54PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior
> Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
>
> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
>Tensor Perth wrote:
>>
>>> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
>>> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor
Perth wrote:
>
> > No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> > stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
> > chances are higher that you can perform t
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:35:54PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
>Tensor Perth wrote:
>
> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large
> Did you try 'disklabel -w da0 auto'?
Yup - it also complained.
> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
> chances are higher that you can perform the transfer with only a
> single I/O.
Ev
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer
PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
> The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
> I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
> external case. These disks had been
> Did you try 'disklabel -w da0 auto'?
Yup - it also complained.
> No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
> stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
> chances are higher that you can perform the transfer with only a
> single I/O.
E
The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
external case. These disks had been doing duty on a boat carrying out seismic
surveys, attached to misc. Sun workstations. These are typical of
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
Tensor Perth wrote:
> The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
> I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
> external case. These disks had been
The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
external case. These disks had been doing duty on a boat carrying out seismic
surveys, attached to misc. Sun workstations. These are typical of
18 matches
Mail list logo
