Re: Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

Sam Pierson wrote: On 8/30/05, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David appears to be talking about how netbsd works. Understand that David does not work on FreeBSD; I'm not even sure he uses it. ... tcpdump and ethereal get the same data. If they display it differently given identica

Re: Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

On 8/30/05, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David appears to be talking about how netbsd works. Understand that > David does not work on FreeBSD; I'm not even sure he uses it. ... > tcpdump and ethereal get the same data. If they display it differently > given identical data then one is

Re: Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

Sam Pierson wrote: On 8/29/05, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sam Pierson wrote: I had some correspondence with the ethereal developers and David Young and apparently there is a bug in how ethereal handles the radiotap header. News to me; the last time I checked it looked correct.

Re: Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

On 8/29/05, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sam Pierson wrote: > >I had some correspondence with the ethereal developers and David Young > > and apparently there is a bug in how ethereal handles the radiotap header. > > News to me; the last time I checked it looked correct. I'm not sure.

Re: Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

Sam Pierson wrote: Hi guys, I'm trying to get an accurate measurement of signal strength (preferably in dBm) on a per-packet basis between two atheros cards that I have. I had some correspondence with the ethereal developers and David Young and apparently there is a bug in how ethereal handle

Atheros driver and radiotap reliability

Hi guys, I'm trying to get an accurate measurement of signal strength (preferably in dBm) on a per-packet basis between two atheros cards that I have. I had some correspondence with the ethereal developers and David Young and apparently there is a bug in how ethereal handles the radiotap header.