>I'd suggest that we need to look at this in two ways:
>
>(1) There's a compile-time INVARIANT that needs to be maintained by
>developers in adding new system calls. When building the kernel, it
>would be useful to have a compile-time assertion that causes a kernel
>compile to fail if
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here i report a patch different from Giorgos' one. The approch is
> completely different: working on syscall_register() function in
> kern/kern_syscalls.c file.
I'd suggest that we need to look at this in two ways:
(1) There's a compile-time INVARI
2 matches
Mail list logo
