RE: C++ incompatability, was C99: Suggestions for style(9)

> > [snip exciting discussion on style] > > > > > There are several C99 features used already, e.g. designated initializers: > > > bla bli = { .blub = "foo", .arr[0] = 42 }; > > > Do you suggest that this should not be used, because it is inconsistent > > > with all the other existing compound i

Re: C++ incompatability, was C99: Suggestions for style(9)

On Fri, 01 May 2009 08:57:34 PDT "Matthew Fleming" wrote: > [snip exciting discussion on style] > > > There are several C99 features used already, e.g. designated initializers: > > bla bli = { .blub = "foo", .arr[0] = 42 }; > > Do you suggest that this should not be used, because it is inco

C++ incompatability, was C99: Suggestions for style(9)

[snip exciting discussion on style] > There are several C99 features used already, e.g. designated initializers: > bla bli = { .blub = "foo", .arr[0] = 42 }; > Do you suggest that this should not be used, because it is inconsistent > with all the other existing compound initialisations? Re