Peter Jeremy wrote:
I'm specifically looking at 2.11BSD - which is architecturally UFS but
various sizes and constants are different (eg fewer direct/indirect
blocks in the inode). In some ways this simplifies things (it may be
possible to re-use much or all of the FreeBSD UFS code) but it
Warren Toomey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for commercial use, that's a separate issue. I don't know how easy
it would be for us to talk Caldera into allowing that.
Isn't Caldera keen on the BSD license? Here's a relevent quote:
Following the acquisition of Webmin by Caldera, all past and
On 2001-Dec-16 17:18:37 +1100, Warren Toomey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, call me crazy, but I thought the 2BSD filesystem layout was
essentially UFS, i.e i-nodes at the start, and therefore would be
pretty much the same as /sys/ufs/ufs in FreeBSD. I'll have to do a
compare of the source
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:29:04AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2001-Dec-16 17:18:37 +1100, Warren Toomey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
The other almost-the-same UFS that could be useful is the Tru64 UFS.
Last time I tried, I could mount a Tru64 UFS CD-ROM on FreeBSD, but
the box would panic
On Sunday, 16 December 2001 at 17:18:37 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
In article by Greg Lehey:
[about if and how Caldera is enforcing the Ancient UNIX
http://www2.caldera.com/offers/ancient.html. Note also
that in fact they allow access to the code via
license
In article by Greg Lehey:
[about if and how Caldera is enforcing the Ancient UNIX
http://www2.caldera.com/offers/ancient.html. Note also
that in fact they allow access to the code via
license described at http://www2.caldera.com/offers/ancient001/
6 matches
Mail list logo
