On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I notice that if you use "malloc" from within a signal handler on
FreeBSD-6.x, that you can potentially trigger a "recursive call" error.
But this seems to have changed in FreeBSD-7.x.
Is it now permissible to call "malloc" from within a si
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:52:13AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Is it now permissible to call "malloc" from within a signal handler in
> FreeBSD-7.x?
No.
Joerg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I notice that if you use "malloc" from within a signal handler on
FreeBSD-6.x, that you can potentially trigger a "recursive call" error.
But this seems to have changed in FreeBSD-7.x.
The malloc implementation is completely new in FreeBSD 7, so not all of
the
I notice that if you use "malloc" from within a signal handler on
FreeBSD-6.x, that you can potentially trigger a "recursive call" error.
But this seems to have changed in FreeBSD-7.x.
Is it now permissible to call "malloc" from within a signal handler in
FreeBSD-7.x?
If so, should the man p
4 matches
Mail list logo