Nat Lanza wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:06, Terry Lambert wrote:
But if that's the argument for removing it, then it's probably
time to remove the ability to use non-DMA IDE drives from the
ATA driver, and kill all the ethernet drivers that have alignment
requirements for their DMA engines,
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > Why announce an intent to kill something that works?
> >
> > Do we just not "like" DoC, as a matter of public policy?
>
> I think phk has a good explaination:
>
> :The driver in the tree works with the M-systems devices I have to
> :test with, but M-Systems have neither s
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:54AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I still use this. Users will not suddenly quit using hardware that
> > > works, they will start using a different OS that works with it, or
> > > they will
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I still use this. Users will not suddenly quit using hardware that
> > works, they will start using a different OS that works with it, or
> > they will be stuck trying to continue to support an old version of
> > FreeBSD beca
David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I still use this. Users will not suddenly quit using hardware that
> works, they will start using a different OS that works with it, or
> they will be stuck trying to continue to support an old version of
> FreeBSD because it works with it.
Read the anno
David Yeske wrote:
> I still use this. Users will not suddenly quit using hardware that
> works, they will start using a different OS that works with it, or
> they will be stuck trying to continue to support an old version of
> FreeBSD because it works with it. FreeBSD is the only BSD that
> curr
I still use this. Users will not suddenly quit using hardware that works, they will
start using a
different OS that works with it, or they will be stuck trying to continue to support
an old
version of FreeBSD because it works with it. FreeBSD is the only BSD that currently
supports the
DOC?
H
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:13:15AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > I realize that there are users of the DiskOnChip hardware out there
> > now, but I seriously don't expect there to be any users once we get
> > to FreeBSD 6.0 so I plant to remove the driver once the 5-sta
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > I realize that there are users of the DiskOnChip hardware out there
> > now, but I seriously don't expect there to be any users once we get
> > to FreeBSD 6.0 so I plant to remove the driver once the 5-stable
> > branch is lai
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I realize that there are users of the DiskOnChip hardware out there
> now, but I seriously don't expect there to be any users once we get
> to FreeBSD 6.0 so I plant to remove the driver once the 5-stable
> branch is laid down.
Why?
To what benefit?
-- Terry
To Unsubs
This is _only_ about the driver for the DiskOnChip devices from
M-Systems. This does not affect any other device. If you have
never seen a /dev/fla0 mounted on your system, you don't need to
read the rest.
I realize that there are users of the DiskOnChip hardware out there
now, but I seriously
11 matches
Mail list logo