Hello hackers...
I got strange problem when trying to implement something like exceptions
with setjmp()/longjmp() functions.
[...]
int ret;
jmpbuf buf;
[...]
ret = setjmp(buf);
KASSERT(ret != 1, (I never return 1 with longjmp().));
[...]
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I got strange problem when trying to implement something like exceptions
with setjmp()/longjmp() functions.
[...]
int ret;
jmpbuf buf;
[...]
ret = setjmp(buf);
KASSERT(ret != 1, (I
Apparently, On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:30:59PM +0100,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek said words to the effect of;
Hello hackers...
I got strange problem when trying to implement something like exceptions
with setjmp()/longjmp() functions.
[...]
int ret;
jmpbuf buf;
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:03:55AM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote:
+ The kernel longjmp only ever seems to return 1. See i386/i386/support.s.
That's right, thanks!
But this is strange, setjmp/longjmp are defined in C99 and there
setjmp() returns value from longjmp().
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
UNIX
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:03:55AM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote:
+ The kernel longjmp only ever seems to return 1. See i386/i386/support.s.
That's right, thanks!
But this is strange, setjmp/longjmp are defined in C99 and
how do you ensure that the thread doesn't own any locks when it does the
longjmp?
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hello hackers...
I got strange problem when trying to implement something like exceptions
with setjmp()/longjmp() functions.
[...]
int ret;
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:51:13AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
+ how do you ensure that the thread doesn't own any locks when it does the
+ longjmp?
Hmm, hard to explain. I got my own infrastructure for this and every locks
that are done I got in my-threads, so I just have to check those thread
7 matches
Mail list logo
