Pretty late to the game, but ...
On Mon, 08.09.2008 at 15:47:20 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Equally as frustrating, mutt's backtick support will only honour the
> > first line of input. If a backticked command returns multiple lines,
> > only the first is read; the re
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:12:53AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Also, some folks on #bsdports asked why I was bothering with this in the
> > first place: mutt supports backticks to run shell commands inside of
> > a muttrc file. See "Building a list of mailboxes o
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:39, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Equally as frustrating, mutt's backtick support will only honour the
> first line of input. If a backticked command returns multiple lines,
> only the first is read; the rest are ignored. This makes using BSD find
> annoying, since find
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:12:53AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Also, some folks on #bsdports asked why I was bothering with this in the
> first place: mutt supports backticks to run shell commands inside of
> a muttrc file. See "Building a list of mailboxes on the fly" below:
>
> http://wiki.
I've been working on $SUBJECT for the past few hours, and have managed
to implement a very crude subset of GNU find's features:
http://www.gnu.org/software/findutils/manual/html_node/find_html/Format-Directives.html#Format-Directives
I've implemented %f and %p (which appear identical to GNU find)
5 matches
Mail list logo
