In the last episode (Sep 15), Paul said:
Is there anyone using fibrechannel SAN solutions with FreeBSD ?
I had a FreeBSD running on a SAN using qlogic cards a few months back
but had to put Linux on it. It works fine.
I have a couple questions:
1) Is concurrent access possible ? Like in a
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I sent to
Support exists for the Qlogic 2100 and 2200 FC-AL cards.
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Papezik Milon wrote:
Hi all,
only simple question :-)
Does FreeBSD support any FibreChannel controller
or does body somebody writing a drive?
For which card card?
Thanks in advance.
Milon
--
Hi all,
only simple question :-)
Does FreeBSD support any FibreChannel controller
or does body somebody writing a drive?
For which card card?
Thanks in advance.
Milon
--
pape...@pvt.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the
Support exists for the Qlogic 2100 and 2200 FC-AL cards.
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Papezik Milon wrote:
Hi all,
only simple question :-)
Does FreeBSD support any FibreChannel controller
or does body somebody writing a drive?
For which card card?
Thanks in advance.
Milon
--
Jason tells me you have my card which exhibited exactly this symptom with
a pc164 two years ago, though it worked in an x86 box.
Isn't that the the one now without a BIOS? That's the old 1020 PCI card,
which Qlogic made maybe 500? It's the only one I have. Did you want
it back?
-matt
Hi- Yes- it was a fun though short lunch.
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is popular, but nobody's written a driver for it for
FreeBSD.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
Matt,
Thank you for lunch at
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
What does not help is that Emulex consider's their hardware / software
interface a trade secret. Meaning NDAs etc.
At least this is the last thing I heared.
Wilko
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the technical manuals that
describe the f/w interface you have to sign an NDA.
On Thu, 4
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
Any reason NetBSD and FreeBSD don't just
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
probably be removed from OpenBSD as soon as the tree unlocks post 2.6.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
probably be removed from
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I sent to
Well, it is.
Matthew Jacob wrote:
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
Any reason
Matthew Jacob wrote:
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 05:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
Qlogic ISP users now have
17 matches
Mail list logo
