On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
> As a contributor to ipfw, notice that I will be sticking my oar into the
> water when it comes to deleting it unless I'm very sure that the ipf stuff
> is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
> tree without a lot of agr
> is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
s/Unless/Especially if/ :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
As a contributor to ipfw, notice that I will be sticking my oar into the
water when it comes to deleting it unless I'm very sure that the ipf stuff
is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
tree without a lot of agreement, especially from those who are working on
it..
On 19 Jun 1999 17:30:13 +0200
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Divert sockets, dummynet and credential-based filtering would be
> sorely missed if they weren't ported to ipfilter.
...but if they were ported to IP Filter, then lots of other systems could
use them, too.
-- Jason R. Thorpe
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Rewriting ipfw rules to ipfilter rules on the fly should be trivial; a
> > > simple Perl script should be sufficient.
> > Not quite as trivial as you think. ipfw and ipf ar
"Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Rewriting ipfw rules to ipfilter rules on the fly should be trivial; a
> > simple Perl script should be sufficient.
> Not quite as trivial as you think. ipfw and ipf are completely backwards when
> it comes
> to rule orde
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 11:12:07AM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > > scripts/prog
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > scripts/programs (ipfw->ipf(5)), and ipfilter would be converted to
> > a KLD, cruft remov
8 matches
Mail list logo
