On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > I think this could be solved by an implicit linker script contained in
> > .so and .a files, pointing to the real libraries.
> > We have already the SHLIB_LDSC
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi bapt, kib,
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi bapt, kib,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we hand
On Sa., 15. Dez. 2012 02:22:34 CET, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking
> > doesn't help for that.
> What do you mean there ? Do you mean that some libra
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking doesn't
> > help
> > for that.
> What do you mean there ? Do you mean that so
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:58:14AM +0100, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Sa., 15. Dez. 2012 02:22:34 CET, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:54:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking doesn't help
> for that.
What do you mean there ? Do you mean that some libraries specified for the
linking stage of the final binary are not needed for th
Hi,
Some of our binary are overlinked, the way we handle the linking doesn't help
for that.
On proposition could be to use pkgconf https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf which
is BSD license pkg-config implementation 100% compatible with pkg-config.
What I propose is to create a new PCADD variable f
9 matches
Mail list logo