There have been some useful responses to my original question, but I
guess I didn't make it clear enough what the question was, because I
got a lot of responses comparing the NFS servers on systems other than
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. I'm only interested in comparing the
performance of these
* Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020623 00:36] wrote:
>
>
> --On Saturday, June 22, 2002 22:23:59 -0700 Alfred Perlstein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I should know, I
> >ported it from BSD/os.
>
> Will it be MFCed ?
Not by me, it
--On Saturday, June 22, 2002 22:23:59 -0700 Alfred Perlstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I should know, I
> ported it from BSD/os.
Will it be MFCed ?
--
Mathieu Arnold
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freeb
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020622 19:28] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote:
> > FreeBSD has very solid NFS code in addition to being a very robust,
> > versatile, and downright fun operating system. It's very easy to do
> > everything I want to
At 7:28 PM -0700 6/22/02, David O'Brien wrote:
>Actually Matt Jacob has some NFS testsuites that makes
>FreeBSD servers blow chunks.
Is that still true, after the fixes to the bugs found
by the NFS-exerciser program we picked up from Apple?
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn= [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
>Actually Matt Jacob has some NFS testsuites that makes FreeBSD servers
>blow chunks. Solaris still is the most robust NFS server of the general
>purpose UNIXes.
I'm quite happy with the performance of my SGI machines as NFS servers.
They're quite robus
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote:
> FreeBSD has very solid NFS code in addition to being a very robust,
> versatile, and downright fun operating system. It's very easy to do
> everything I want to with FreeBSD. It's NFS is missing locking support
> but it's very
Terry makes some very excellent points that I've tested and documented
in "Real Life". Two years ago I did a bunch of extensive testing between
three NFS servers (Sun, FreeBSD, NetApp) and one set of NFS clients
(FreeBSD). Anyone that knows NFS really well would have predicted our
test results
Dan Ellard wrote:
> Has anyone done a side-by-side benchmark of the FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and
> NetBSD NFS servers on the same hardware? Note that I'm interested in
> server performance, not client performance.
>
> I'm particularly interested in read performance, but anything would be
> interesting.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Dan Ellard wrote:
>In lieu of actual data, which system do people think makes the best
>NFS server for heavily-loaded systems?
I've got no numbers to back it up but I'd say the performance I've seen
is in this order:
IRIX/XFS/NFSv3
FreeBSD/FFS/NFSv3
Linux/XFS/NFSv3
Brandon
Has anyone done a side-by-side benchmark of the FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and
NetBSD NFS servers on the same hardware? Note that I'm interested in
server performance, not client performance.
I'm particularly interested in read performance, but anything would be
interesting.
In lieu of actual data, whi
11 matches
Mail list logo
