David O'Brien([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.24 19:59:41 +:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:49:16AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies http://www.chaltech.com
> > are available from Simtek http://www.simtec.co.uk/
>
> This brings up the issue of refe
CTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for ARM processor
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> >
> > Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies http://www.chaltech.com
> > are available from Si
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 8:26 am, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies
> > http://www.chaltech.com are available from Simtek
> > http://www.simtec.co.uk/
>
> No pricing anywhere that I could find.
I believe that they cost about 700
Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies http://www.chaltech.com
> are available from Simtek http://www.simtec.co.uk/
No pricing anywhere that I could find.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the bo
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 7:59, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:49:16AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies
> > http://www.chaltech.com are available from Simtek
> > http://www.simtec.co.uk/
>
> This brings up the issue of reference
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:05:44PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: > There are a number of other StrongARM based Windows CE machines that
: > would make a much better platform. They even have NetBSD/hpcarm on
:
: These sound hard to develop fo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:05:44PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> There are a number of other StrongARM based Windows CE machines that
> would make a much better platform. They even have NetBSD/hpcarm on
These sound hard to develop for as you'll probably have to launch them
from Windows CE.
> Fail
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: There are a number of other StrongARM based Windows CE machines that
: would make a much better platform. They even have NetBSD/hpcarm on
: them, which would allow one to host the FreeSBD development on them if
: you really wanted to do so. Th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: The Compaq iPaq comes to mind. However, it is not development-friendly
: at the moment as it does not have peripherals such as built-in NIC, hard
: drive, or serial console capabilities.
I thought it did have a serial port... All of the P
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> where can i get those platforms in europe (germany)?
No clue.
> have you got a contact at dec?
Dried up.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:49:16AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> Strongarm-based pcs designed by Chalice Technologies http://www.chaltech.com
> are available from Simtek http://www.simtec.co.uk/
This brings up the issue of reference platform for the StrongARM port.
There is no one clear choice as
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:51:28AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:39:18PM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
> > > > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #271: Sun Jul 22 08:36:22 EDT 2001
> > > >
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/users/spotvin/work/FreeBSD/src/sys/arm/
> > > > compile/NET
quot;Stephane E. Potvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for ARM processor
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
David O'Brien([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.24 07:51:28 +:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:39:18PM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
> > > > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #271: Sun Jul 22 08:36:22 EDT 2001
> > > >
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/users/spotvin/work/FreeBSD/src/sys/arm/
> > > > compile/NETWIN
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:39:18PM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
> > > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #271: Sun Jul 22 08:36:22 EDT 2001
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/users/spotvin/work/FreeBSD/src/sys/arm/
> > > compile/NETWINDER
..snip..
> I'll try to post my work next weekend so people could
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 03:10:56PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Stephane E. Potvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010722 07:57] wrote:
> > I tought that some might be interested by this:
> >
> > Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
> > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1
* Stephane E. Potvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010722 07:57] wrote:
> I tought that some might be interested by this:
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> The Regents of the University of California. All r
At 12:43 PM + 7/22/01, Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
>I thought that some might be interested by this:
>
>Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
>Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserve
From: "Stephane E. Potvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FreeBSD for ARM processor
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 12:43:27 +
> I tought that some might be interested by this:
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,
I *am* interested by any progress on an ARM machine : I don't yet have
resources to work on such a beast, but I thought on installing NetBSD on
one of our ARM eval boards.
If this is FreeBSD, all the better ...
TfH
PS : a fuller dmesg will be appreciated (along with more detail on your
I tought that some might be interested by this:
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
sysinit->subsystem 0x0081
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #271: S
21 matches
Mail list logo
