Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, that single 4GB of address space is divided up into kernel data
structures, which are in the address space of the process but subject
to various levels of MMU-provided memory protection, and the process'
own "user data." I believe the break is
I know very little about how kernel or low level processor stuff works, but
shouldn't we be able to do a 4GB process on a 32-bit system?
The limitation of 2GB per process should only be an issue if there is some
need to use signed numbers, right?
Well, that single 4GB of address space is
On 12-Mar-01 Joseph Gleason wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Ian Campbell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 23:41
Subject: Re: Greater than 2GB per process
* Ian Campbell [EMAI
Hello,
Could anybody advise me on the possiblity of having greater than
2GB per process on FreeBSD. I have tried increasing the limit beyond this
and the kernel compiles successfully - however libc causes every process
to segfault. I am assuming that just recompiling the C library
* Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010311 16:14] wrote:
Hello,
Could anybody advise me on the possiblity of having greater than
2GB per process on FreeBSD. I have tried increasing the limit beyond this
and the kernel compiles successfully - however libc causes every process
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Ian Campbell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 23:41
Subject: Re: Greater than 2GB per process
* Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010311 16:14] wrote:
He
23:41
Subject: Re: Greater than 2GB per process
* Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010311 16:14] wrote:
Hello,
Could anybody advise me on the possiblity of having greater than
2GB per process on FreeBSD. I have tried increasing the limit beyond
this
and the kernel c
7 matches
Mail list logo
