Re: IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

2005-09-22 Thread Nate Nielsen
No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it) could only use one IP address as it's public address. Cheers, Nate Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: Exists the possibility to make NAT POOL with IPFW + NATD ? ___

Re: IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

2005-09-22 Thread Phil Regnauld
Nate Nielsen (nielsen-list) writes: No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it) could only use one IP address as it's public address. One could use probability rules to divert to different natds with different NAT addresses, and use choparp / aliases to

Re: IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

2005-09-22 Thread Paolo Pisati
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:41:16AM +, Nate Nielsen wrote: No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it) could only use one IP address as it's public address. FYI you can use nat inside ipfw[*]: ipfw nat 1 config ip 192.168.0.123 ipfw nat 2 config ip 192.168.0.456

Re: IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

2005-09-22 Thread Chris Dionissopoulos
Nice work! Is possible to implement a port address forwarding (aka PAT) using some ipfw rules? (or with any other way) Something similar to -redirect_port option of natd(8). TIA, Chris. Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:41:16AM +, Nate Nielsen wrote: No. I think each

IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

2005-09-21 Thread Daniel Dias Gonçalves
Exists the possibility to make NAT POOL with IPFW + NATD ? -- daniel ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]