Ben wrote:
I'm sorry, I can't send this to the list because my messages to the list
bounce because reverse DNS isn't set up.
No worries, thanks a lot for answering.
This is funny, I just set this up for the first time yesterday except I
set everything up to have no IP addresses so that the
Hi there,
I've been running into some problems with what is supposed to be a
filtering bridge with IPFW, on FreeBSD 5.4-REL0.
IPFW has been compiled into kernel:
options BRIDGE
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
options IPDIVERT
a
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:20:37 +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See nemesistcp from ports.
Isn't this a tool to generate packets, like ipsend(1) and iptest(1)?
>
> I doubt. Faster with logging & scripts.
Do you mean ipfw's log option? If I wanted to see which rule number a
Viktor Ivanov wrote:
Hello -hackers.
I'm thinking about an utility to test a simple packet against the
machine's firewall (ipfw2 to be more specific). I needed it because on
some of my routers the configuration got complicated and the rule
count is too high. And sometimes I need to s
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Viktor Ivanov wrote:
> count is too high. And sometimes I need to see quickly what a
> colleague have done to the firewall and why it's not working as
> expected.
use rcs or cvs for tracking changes
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
__
Hello -hackers.
I'm thinking about an utility to test a simple packet against the
machine's firewall (ipfw2 to be more specific). I needed it because on
some of my routers the configuration got complicated and the rule
count is too high. And sometimes I need to see quickly what a
coll
In a message written on Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:32:17PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> me what will happen when net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_count reaches
> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max value?
As a random passing thought...
Anytime a new dynamic rule is denied due to reaching dyn_max, a new
counter, eg, "dropped_dyn_
urned off
one-pass?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ganbold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: January 4, 2004 4:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ipfw2 problem
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 5.2-current machine for firewa
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 5.2-current machine for firewall. It is configured as a
bridged ipfw2 firewall.
Also this machine works a a traffic shaper using ip dummynet features.
The machine has 2GHz Pentium 4 CPU and 128MB RAM and 3 Intel Pro 100MB
cards. 2 cards are used
for bridging.
Every
I reproduced it on the latest 5.1current.
Here is the backtrace:
#
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Ty
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:28:07PM -0400, Matthew George wrote:
...
> > you can count the traffic with dynamic rules (but this does not go
> > to the logfile), not sure what you mean by 'see the transfered data file'
>
> from ipf(5):
>
> LOGGING
>When a packet is logged, with either the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:07:13PM +0200, Uwe Klann wrote:
From the Log file IPFW:-
"Sep 22 00:24:13 muc /kernel: ipfw: 3300 Accept TCP 217.10.213.30:4418
217.9.121.209:21 in via fxp0"
How can I extend on FreeBSD 4.8 (ipfw2) the log contens to see the tranfered
data File and the amoun
"
> >
> > How can I extend on FreeBSD 4.8 (ipfw2) the log contens to see the tranfered
> > data File and the amount of bytes went out? Thank you in advance for your
>
> you can count the traffic with dynamic rules (but this does not go
> to the logfile), not su
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:07:13PM +0200, Uwe Klann wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> >From the Log file IPFW:-
> "Sep 22 00:24:13 muc /kernel: ipfw: 3300 Accept TCP 217.10.213.30:4418
> 217.9.121.209:21 in via fxp0"
>
> How can I extend on FreeBSD 4.8 (ipfw2) the log conten
Hi All,
>From the Log file IPFW:-
"Sep 22 00:24:13 muc /kernel: ipfw: 3300 Accept TCP 217.10.213.30:4418
217.9.121.209:21 in via fxp0"
How can I extend on FreeBSD 4.8 (ipfw2) the log contens to see the tranfered
data File and the amount of bytes went out? Thank you in advance
> We're diverting all received and sended packets (from\to port Y) to divert port X.
> But these rules are not working together with ipfw2 (5.0 Release). Each single rule
> works fine, but when i combine them together only first of them triggers. The order
> doesn't matter.
>
>
.
But these rules are not working together with ipfw2 (5.0 Release). Each single rule
works fine, but when i combine them together only first of them triggers. The order
doesn't matter.
What am I doing wrong?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
17 matches
Mail list logo
