Re: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg"

2008-11-13 Thread Tim Kientzle
Ok, that's sort of a different question. "nodump" is only checked by /sbin/dump tar obeys the nodump flag as well if you specify the --nodump option. Hmmm... Now that I think of it, cpio should also have that option; I'll put that on my TODO list. Tim

Re: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg"

2008-11-13 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 13), Charles Darwin said: > On 12-Nov-08, at 6:43 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Nov 12), Charles Darwin said: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Title is the question actually: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = > &g

Re: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg"

2008-11-13 Thread Charles Darwin
On 12-Nov-08, at 6:43 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Nov 12), Charles Darwin said: Hi all, Title is the question actually: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg" No; why would it be? I mean as far as their effect on a directory; doesn't &q

Re: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg"

2008-11-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 12), Charles Darwin said: > Hi all, > > Title is the question actually: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg" No; why would it be? From /usr/include/sys/stat.h: #define UF_NODUMP 0x0001 /* do not dump file */ #define SF_N

Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg"

2008-11-12 Thread Charles Darwin
Hi all, Title is the question actually: Is chflags' "nodump + sunlnk" = "uchg" Thanks, Charles ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"