} As the culprit behind PT_READ_U's demise, I'm willing to dive in
} and help here if needed.
}Thanks but Julian sent me a patch for 4.5 that seems to work
}with no changes in ups. Would be nice if PT_READ_U is put
}back in 4.x.
As a followup to this old thread (and as the poster of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
}Julian Elischer's diff as applied to the 4.5-RELEASE included
}below. With this change ups-3.37-beta4 compiled unchanged.
}
}But note that you still can't change any registers. If
}PT_WRITE_U is added back to the FreeBSD-4.x branch, no change
}is necessary to ups. So
Bakul Shah writes:
} As the culprit behind PT_READ_U's demise, I'm willing to dive in
} and help here if needed.
}Thanks but Julian sent me a patch for 4.5 that seems to work
}with no changes in ups. Would be nice if PT_READ_U is put
}back in 4.x.
As a followup to this old thread (and as the
Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around much longer since it
As the culprit behind PT_READ_U's demise, I'm willing to dive in
and help here if needed.
Thanks but Julian sent me a patch for 4.5 that seems to work
with no changes in ups. Would be nice if PT_READ_U is put
back in 4.x.
Now that I think about it, ups will need to be fixed up since
the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
7 matches
Mail list logo
