On 5/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cant seem to get something working and would really appreciate some
h elp.
I use IPFW and have used NAT in the past through the ipfw "divert"
rules.
But what i need to get right is simply nat for a particular host
inter
I cant seem to get something working and would really appreciate some
h= elp.
I use IPFW and have used NAT in the past through the ipfw= "divert"
rules.
But what i need to get right is simply nat for a = particular host
internally to a external mail server.
Now i ca= n nat all
Dear all, hello!
As my first post I would like to seek some help :)
I'm currently installing a bsd firewall to replace a cisco router for the
filtering and NAT.
Our network is composed of several server having a public IP each on the
net.
Ihave managed with natd to make the entries from intern
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 08:39:45AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
...
> Now that I've used IPFW2 for something more complicated than simple
> host filtering I see that the syntax and structure makes something
> like a firewall/nat box for any moderately interesting config way
> too complicated with way
Original broken case:
In a message written on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 03:17:12PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > ipfw add 1000 divert natd ip from any to any recv fxp0
> > ipfw add 1001 divert natd ip from any to any xmit fxp0
In a message written on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:28:09PM -0800, Luigi Riz
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 03:17:12PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
...
> I must not be clear on what "in" "out" "recv" and "xmit" mean, and
> after reading the manual page 3 times I'm now even more confused.
The names are reasonably intuitive...
"in" matches packets on the INput path (basic
Well, I found the solution to my problem by random chance (futzing with
other things), and it still doesn't make sense.
Works:
> ipfw add 1000 divert natd ip from any to any via fxp0
Doesn't work:
> ipfw add 1000 divert natd ip from any to any recv fxp0
> ipfw add 1001 divert natd ip from any
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:54:39AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> doesn't? Yes, I want to do something fancier treating inbound and
> outbound traffic differently, but this basic case doesn't seem to
> work, and it seems to me like it should. What am I missing?
Have you configured IPFW2 (if runnin
Can someone explain to me why:
ipfw add 1000 divert natd ip from any to any via fxp0
works, and yet:
ipfw add 1000 divert natd ip from any to any recv fxp0
ipfw add 1001 divert natd ip from any to any xmit fxp0
doesn't? Yes, I want to do something fancier treating inbound and
outbound traffic
9 matches
Mail list logo
