Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:29:59PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: I've prepared a status report about this project. the xml file in attachment have to be reviewed since I've just put descriptions from FreeBSD-rc's Yahoo! Group and your email message. WHY in the world are you sending in a

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:29:59PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: I've prepared a status report about this project. the xml file in attachment have to be reviewed since I've just put descriptions from FreeBSD-rc's Yahoo! Group and your email message. WHY in the

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Cyrille Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just reporting this one exists as you report the existence of Kevin Way's work two days ago. of course, it would be better to have a -rc mailing list. Not really. One more list to follow, when threads in existing lists will probably be enough

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your rcorder patch is incorrect. Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and connect rcorder(8) to the build? YES I MIND!! What part of it is on the

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, fparseln() is defined in libutil.h (per the man page). I don't have my current box available (power outage at home), but if you could look over it, it should work. Ah, that's right - I couldn't find

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-19 Thread Doug Rabson
On 18 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64. I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I ought to know better... Fortunately (?) it doesn't matter in this case. Function arguments which

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: M1 (Patch included) Setup infrastructure Make rcorder compile Your rcorder patch is incorrect. FreeBSD lacks a prototype for fparseln(). It so happens that it doesn't make any difference on any of the platforms FreeBSD supports (because our ints and

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Hi, I've prepared a status report about this project. the xml file in attachment have to be reviewed since I've just put descriptions from FreeBSD-rc's Yahoo! Group and your email message. first of all, there should be a consensus about the owner of this project ? also, who create the

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
after reading -arch, the contact and links sections have been updated. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] !-- $FreeBSD$ -- project titlercNG: Improving FreeBSD startup scripts/title contact person name givenDoug Barton/given

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On 18 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: M1 (Patch included) Setup infrastructure Make rcorder compile Your rcorder patch is incorrect. FreeBSD lacks a prototype for fparseln(). It so happens that it doesn't make any difference on any of

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On 18 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your rcorder patch is incorrect. Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and connect rcorder(8) to the build? Actually, fparseln() is defined in libutil.h (per the man page). I

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, fparseln() is defined in libutil.h (per the man page). I don't have my current box available (power outage at home), but if you could look over it, it should work. Ah, that's right - I couldn't find the right header, I should have simply

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: M1 (Patch included) Setup infrastructure Make rcorder compile Your rcorder patch is incorrect. FreeBSD lacks a prototype for fparseln(). It so happens that it doesn't make any difference on any of the

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64. I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I ought to know better... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: New rc.d init script roadmap

2001-10-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your rcorder patch is incorrect. Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and connect rcorder(8) to the build? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: Makefile