Am 18.07.2006 um 06:39 schrieb David Gilbert:
[3:15:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/failsafe netstat -rn
...
192.168.22.1 192.168.12.2 UH 00 tun0
shouldn't the last route there be active? Any clues here?
The last time I tried to get a tun interface set up
The man pages of if_tun are out-of-date in some respects, but with
comments from the group and reading the sources of ppp, I have worked
around most of the problems I've found. However, I'm stuck with one
quandry. My tunnel setup process produces the following:
tun0:
matt == matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ responding to my lack of tun routing ]
matt Have you set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 via sysctl?
yes.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
The man pages of if_tun are out-of-date in some respects, but with
comments from the group and reading the sources of ppp, I have worked
around most of the problems I've found. However, I'm stuck with one
quandry. My tunnel setup process produces the following:
tun0:
4 matches
Mail list logo