Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.

2006-07-19 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 18.07.2006 um 06:39 schrieb David Gilbert: [3:15:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/failsafe netstat -rn ... 192.168.22.1 192.168.12.2 UH 00 tun0 shouldn't the last route there be active? Any clues here? The last time I tried to get a tun interface set up

Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.

2006-07-18 Thread matt
The man pages of if_tun are out-of-date in some respects, but with comments from the group and reading the sources of ppp, I have worked around most of the problems I've found. However, I'm stuck with one quandry. My tunnel setup process produces the following: tun0:

Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.

2006-07-18 Thread David Gilbert
matt == matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ responding to my lack of tun routing ] matt Have you set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 via sysctl? yes. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To

On the use of Tun interfaces.

2006-07-17 Thread David Gilbert
The man pages of if_tun are out-of-date in some respects, but with comments from the group and reading the sources of ppp, I have worked around most of the problems I've found. However, I'm stuck with one quandry. My tunnel setup process produces the following: tun0: