Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kevin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000712 14:14] wrote: > > It's in recent versions of stable and current. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/sys/kqueue.2 > > Ah, thank you! > > How does kqueue interact with uthreads? I noticed that aio_waitcomplete() > blocks the entire

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kevin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000712 13:25] wrote: > > Have a look at "man kqueue", it's a really nifty interface that works > > very well. > > I've seen other references to kqueue on this list, but have yet to find it. > Where can I find the man page in cvs? Is this on -CURRENT or -STABLE?

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Peter Dufault
> > > > Is there any present plans to implement the posix realtime signal queues in the > > freeBSD kernel? ... > > Have a look at "man kqueue", it's a really nifty interface that works > very well. I will and will look at adding the signal semantics. If anyone sees where the RTMX source code,

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Shane Nay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000711 14:41] wrote: > Curiousity strikes me: > > Is there any present plans to implement the posix realtime signal queues in the > freeBSD kernel? I fear I'm not too up on this portion of developement, but > I've been looking around to see if it's implemented an

POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-11 Thread Shane Nay
Curiousity strikes me: Is there any present plans to implement the posix realtime signal queues in the freeBSD kernel? I fear I'm not too up on this portion of developement, but I've been looking around to see if it's implemented and it looks like it's not the case. I'm writing some library cod