Hello all,
Will we be seeing a move in this direction towards a more configurable
security script? Is anyone planning it?
What about a configuration language?
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
IMO, introducing a sort of silent mode to these periodic scripts would help
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Rognes
s writes:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Fotis Georgatos wrote:
Why bother with complex shell scripts when you can have most
needed functionality in a single C program?
I've found myself replacing 10-20 lines of shell code with a single line.
WHAT? Are
James Howard wrote:
Will we be seeing a move in this direction towards a more configurable
security script? Is anyone planning it?
I am porting the scripts to Linux and will hold off on security if
nothing is being planned or make the changes myself. I just do not want
to duplicate
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:30:24PM +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
IMO, introducing a sort of silent mode to these periodic scripts would help
sysadmins.
[snip]
Your suggestions?
As far as I'm concerned, this would greatly increase the utility of
these scripts. I would love to see this
4 matches
Mail list logo
