On Sunday 21 August 2011 06:13 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 02/08/2011 00:06 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > On Monday 01 August 2011 04:10 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> >>> I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with
> >>> su
on 02/08/2011 00:06 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:10 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
>>> I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with such
>>> CPU/motherboard combo, too. I also believe it works well but
on 02/08/2011 00:08 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:07 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
>>> amdtemp(4) attaches under PCI bus but its sibling on function 2
>>> isn't easy to address, i.e., hostbN.
>>
>> pci_find_bsf() shoul
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:21:38 -0300
Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 15:52:30 Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:28:29PM -0300 I heard the voice of
> >
> > Mario Lobo, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which
> >
On Monday 01 August 2011 15:52:30 Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:28:29PM -0300 I heard the voice of
>
> Mario Lobo, and lo! it spake thus:
> > Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which my
> > phenom 955 doesn't fit.
>
> Not that it helps you now, but
On Monday 01 August 2011 04:07 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > amdtemp(4) attaches under PCI bus but its sibling on function 2
> > isn't easy to address, i.e., hostbN.
>
> pci_find_bsf() should help with that.
I thought about that but it seemed lik
On Monday 01 August 2011 04:10 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with such
> > CPU/motherboard combo, too. I also believe it works well but
> > errata is errata. If vendor says we shouldn't use
on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with such
> CPU/motherboard combo, too. I also believe it works well but errata
> is errata. If vendor says we shouldn't use it, then we shouldn't.
> In fact, I am just following Linux
on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> amdtemp(4) attaches under PCI bus but its sibling on function 2 isn't
> easy to address, i.e., hostbN.
pci_find_bsf() should help with that.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
On Monday 01 August 2011 03:03 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> [cc list trimmed]
>
> on 01/08/2011 19:23 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > I gave up the DiodeOffset recently because a lot of BIOSes do not
> > set any meaningful values. Instead, I added a tunable for that.
> > Please see the attached
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:28:29PM -0300 I heard the voice of
Mario Lobo, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which my
> phenom 955 doesn't fit.
Not that it helps you now, but the 955 _is_ perfectly compatible with
AM3. It's only the initial 920
[cc list trimmed]
on 01/08/2011 19:23 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> I gave up the DiodeOffset recently because a lot of BIOSes do not set
> any meaningful values. Instead, I added a tunable for that. Please
> see the attached patch, which is also available from here:
>
> http://people.fr
On Sunday 31 July 2011 08:28 pm, Mario Lobo wrote:
> Hi to all
>
> In my desktop machine, I had an AM2+ ASROCK mobo with Phenom II 955
> BE that showed each core temperature perfectly under FBSD 8-STABLE,
> via dev.cpu.x.temp. amdtemp.ko loaded.
>
> Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 b
On Monday 01 August 2011 10:14 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/08/2011 03:28 Mario Lobo said the following:
> > Hi to all
> >
> > In my desktop machine, I had an AM2+ ASROCK mobo with Phenom II
> > 955 BE that showed each core temperature perfectly under FBSD
> > 8-STABLE, via dev.cpu.x.temp. amdte
on 01/08/2011 03:28 Mario Lobo said the following:
> Hi to all
>
> In my desktop machine, I had an AM2+ ASROCK mobo with Phenom II 955 BE that
> showed each core temperature perfectly under FBSD 8-STABLE, via
> dev.cpu.x.temp. amdtemp.ko loaded.
>
> Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found A
Hi to all
In my desktop machine, I had an AM2+ ASROCK mobo with Phenom II 955 BE that
showed each core temperature perfectly under FBSD 8-STABLE, via
dev.cpu.x.temp. amdtemp.ko loaded.
Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which my phenom 955
doesn't fit. So I got an ASUS
16 matches
Mail list logo
