Theoretically the sequential write rate should be same or
higher than the sequential read rate. Given an N+1 disk
Seq write rate for the whole RAID5 array will always be lower
than the write rate for it's single disk.
You compute max data rates by considering the most optimistic
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[missing attribution]
You compute max data rates by considering the most optimistic
scenario, which is large sequetial writes. For *this*
situation write rate will be higher than a single disk's.
How can the RAID5 write rate be higher for
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[missing attribution]
You compute max data rates by considering the most optimistic
scenario, which is large sequetial writes. For *this*
situation write rate will be higher than a single disk's.
How can the RAID5 write rate be higher
You compute max data rates by considering the most optimistic
scenario, which is large sequetial writes. For *this*
situation write rate will be higher than a single disk's.
How can the RAID5 write rate be higher for the whole array if not
only it needs to write the data to all if its
I built an Asus A8N SLI Deluxe based system and installed
FreeBSD-6.1-BETA1 on it. This works well enough. Now I am
looking for a decent RAID5 solution. This motherboard has
two SATA RAID controllers. But one does only RAID1. The
other supports RAID5 but seems to require s/w assistance from
Theoretically the sequential write rate should be same or
higher than the sequential read rate. Given an N+1 disk
Seq write rate for the whole RAID5 array will always be lower
than the write rate for it's single disk.
See 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#RAID_5'
Traditional RAID5
A1
Theoretically the sequential write rate should be same or
higher than the sequential read rate. Given an N+1 disk
Seq write rate for the whole RAID5 array will always be lower
than the write rate for it's single disk.
You compute max data rates by considering the most optimistic
7 matches
Mail list logo
