Hello,
Thank you Terry for your answer, I got your meaning. IMHO we can
safely commit my patch meanwhile:
http://news1.macomnet.ru/~maxim/p/kern_lockf.c.diff
Committers? :-)
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Alfred, John, thanks you very much for your
Hello,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Yes I saw this, I have no idea what 'JH' stands for either that's why
I left it as is.
The problem is that VTOI is ufs specific, this fix will break
LOCKF_DEBUG for all other FS's other than UFS because it casts
the vnode-data ptr to
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Alfred, John, thanks you very much for your answers. I expected
something similar. Btw are there any smart ways to find out does
underlying FS support inode concept or not? Yes, I know about
vnode.v_tag, but comparing it with VT_UFS/VT_NFS/VT_MFS etc does not
look OK
Yes I saw this, I have no idea what 'JH' stands for either that's why
I left it as is.
The problem is that VTOI is ufs specific, this fix will break
LOCKF_DEBUG for all other FS's other than UFS because it casts
the vnode-data ptr to struct inode *.
So your fix is broken.
Please just fix
On 15-Nov-01 Maxim Konovalov wrote:
It panics because of if_inode is not initiliazed:
/sys/kern/kern_lockf.c:1.25:153
/* lock-lf_inode = ip; */ /* XXX JH */
I have no idea what ``JH'' means, the comment appeared in 1.10.
revision 1.10
date: 1997/02/10 02:09:36; author: dyson;
5 matches
Mail list logo
