On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:26:06AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
> > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> > seems odd to have a knob called portmap_e
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brian Somers writes:
> : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes:
> : > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> : > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> : > : seems odd to have a knob cal
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brian Somers writes:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes:
: > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: > : seems odd to have a knob called portma
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes:
> : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> : seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
> : something called rpcbind (
* Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010731 10:53] wrote:
> David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > > Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
> > > > > Does anybody know (r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes:
: Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
: something called rpcbind (not to men
David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
> > > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> > > > wasn't rena
On 31-Jul-01 David Malone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
>> Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
>> > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
>> > > wasn't renamed to rpcb
On 31-Jul-01 Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
> something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POL
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
> > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> > > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind?
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
> > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> > seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually s
11 matches
Mail list logo