Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thanks to all for the help with the timing question. Increasing the hz to
> 400 (in param.c) allowed for granularity of 5ms, which is what we needed.
> For those as unknowing as I was about unix timing, I ran across the
> following url which explained why
Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> NB. for achieving higher timer resolutions you might find it
> interesting to look at Soft-Timers at Rice [2]. Events are scheduled
> at the usual timer interrupt frequency but the time wheels are also
> checked at system-call and other interrupt times, thus, depending o
thanks to all for the help with the timing question. Increasing the hz to
400 (in param.c) allowed for granularity of 5ms, which is what we needed.
For those as unknowing as I was about unix timing, I ran across the
following url which explained why a setting of 400hz allows for a max
resolution
"Weiguang SHI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: timing question
> >Da
* Weiguang SHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010807 11:11] wrote:
>
>
>
> >From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: timin
>From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: timing question
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:49:55 -0500
>
>* Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Behl wrote:
> please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate
> place to post this sort of question
>
> we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following
> problem. It seems that the shortest amount of time the below code will
> sleep for
* Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010806 12:48] wrote:
> please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate
> place to post this sort of question
>
> we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following
> problem. It seems that the shortest amount of
8 matches
Mail list logo