Re: [Review please] (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath manpath.config)

1999-08-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ruslan Ermilov writes: > How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive, > which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the > directory is not considered an error. Sure. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: [Review please] (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath manpath.config)

1999-08-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive, > which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the > directory is not considered an error. Sure. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscr

Re: [Review please] (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath manpath.config)

1999-08-14 Thread Mark Murray
> DES, Mark, -hackers! > > How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive, > which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the > directory is not considered an error. Cool! Do it, I say! M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.or

Re: [Review please] (was: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath manpath.config)

1999-08-14 Thread Mark Murray
> DES, Mark, -hackers! > > How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive, > which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the > directory is not considered an error. Cool! Do it, I say! M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.o