List complaint (Was: Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime)

2005-04-23 Thread Peter Kieser
Someone really needs to remove this guy from the list (or at least give him an official warning of some kind). His repeated warnings on the list has not done anything to his conduct nor has it caused him to stop his childish antics. All he is doing is polluting the list archives. In the 4

Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime

2005-04-22 Thread Peter Kieser
Why must you continue to respond to threads that you have no answer for, wasting our bandwidth, disk space, and time to read your useless messages? --Peter c0ldbyte wrote: On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: I Change: net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 - 3600

Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime

2005-04-21 Thread c0ldbyte
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: Hi: Anyone know what are the sysctl option to give more lifetime to net packets? Or another anything to elongate the net packets lifetime without use ipfw2? Thanks. sysctl -a |grep ttl will grep for any matching (Time To Live) settings. if thats what

Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime

2005-04-21 Thread c0ldbyte
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: I Change: net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 - 3600 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 - 10 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 - 1024 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 - 2500 ¿Are good these values? , ¿i need chanege another value? Dont know my friend. I