Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:14:27PM +0530, S.Gopinath wrote:
I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:14:27PM +0530, S.Gopinath wrote:
Dear Sir,
I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
load ibcs
On 2002-05-23 22:38, echo dev wrote:
Now the problem is when the player answers it correctly it ouputs
would you like to play again.. When it prompts for your answer it
automaicly acwers it self.
scanf(%c, qNa);
printf(WOULD YOU LIKE TO PLAY AGAIN?(y/n));
scanf(%c, qNa);
Just don't use
On May 23, echo dev wrote:
is there anyone that might know why the fflush did not work I fugre
this works besuse it shoves an empty vale into the buffer thus casuseing
it to be empty.
From the C-FAQ - http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
12.26: How can I flush pending input so
From now on, please use the test@ email list for testing. None of us care
if your Mail:: module works
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Charlie Root wrote:
Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
Mail::Internet.
Testing.
one
From foo
Now why do I have this uneasy feeling that you just fell for
a spammer's email address collection bait..
G'luck,
Peter
--
If wishes were fishes, the antecedent of this conditional would be true.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 08:42:17AM -0700, Laurence Berland wrote:
From now on, please use the
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010723 19:47] wrote:
Hello
I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
struct write_args
On 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
struct write_args *wstructure;
struct open_args *ostructure;
ostructure-path=/tmp/blehfile;
ostructure-flags = O_CREAT;
ostructure-mode = 0;
wstructure-fd =
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010723 19:47] wr
ote:
Hello
I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
static int write_file(struct proc
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Mattias Berge wrote:
Hi, I have sme major problems with getting the SMP support to work.
My machine is a Compaq Proliant 380D with dual 733 mhz pIII processors.
I run FreeBSD 4.3-REL.
I have added the two SMP lines in my kernel conf and delöeted the I*86_CPU
that I do
* Aman Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010405 19:37]:
i aim to make ufs run as a module on FreeBSD, which
surely would require a lot of serious kernel
code-entry points.
-- pitfall
1. the system after boot will load the kernel image
into core fromdisc.
2.
Actually, it's possibly to do what he's talking about... RE: Using
ReiserFS as a root filesystem, XFS, etc. As well as HURD which uses a
seperate fs server, and Johannes Helander's Lites thesis talks about doing
the same.
It is not at all like doing FS support as a module.
/joseph
--
Joseph
* Joseph Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 09:46]:
Actually, it's possibly to do what he's talking about... RE: Using
ReiserFS as a root filesystem, XFS, etc. As well as HURD which uses a
seperate fs server, and Johannes Helander's Lites thesis talks about doing
the same.
It is not at all
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
It is not at all like doing FS support as a module.
Is that because of the loader? I still don't understand how a kernel
can load a module from a disk it doesn't know how to read yet?
Although I have a horrible feeling everyone else does...
The loader
Don't worry, Rasputin, we're not all really out to get you.
(Reminder to the Get Rasputin! club, we'll be meeting at 7AM on
irc.newgold.net in #Tech to discuss more ideas to confuse him).
Actually, I'd point you to some good papers, but I don't know any. In
fact, I'm not even sure how I
* Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 10:08]:
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
The loader can load the kernel and modules off any filesystem it understands.
^^
Gimme a 'D'! Gimme an 'O'! Gimme an 'H'!
For some reason I thought the kernel loaded
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
* Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 10:08]:
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
The loader can load the kernel and modules off any filesystem it understands.
^^
Gimme a 'D'! Gimme an 'O'! Gimme an 'H'!
For
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Aman Sharma wrote:
project *
** kldload ufs ***
i feel that a real microkernel OS should'nt have a
bloated kernel in the sense, that heavy OS equipment
like a FileSystem should run as a module on top of the
kernel.
i aim to
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:28PM -0800, dannyman wrote:
Has anyone patched 4.x OpenSSH and/or the relevant ports to deal with the CRC
checksum exploit? I've got to get 2.3 working on my 3.x box, but just
incrementing the number in the Makefile causes patch-aa to go rejected ...
Ohhh, fat
I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
like) 'sudo'..
You can get it under your ports tree:
/usr/ports/security/sudo/
Or on-line:
www.freebsd.org/ports/security.html
RSN
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Michael Chong wrote:
I have a question about FreeBSD...is it possible to
I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
like) 'sudo'..
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file, which may not really be what you want.
As a Unix advocate in general, I'm looking forward to seeing how well
Sun does
David Talkington wrote:
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file,
This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
It
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Talkington wrote:
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file,
This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some
Greg Black wrote:
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file,
This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
Wow, the
Hi!
Ever read the bottom of the mails??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Regardsm
Freddy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Manny Obrey wrote:
I saw the following near the end of running "make depend;make" during a
kernel re-config ... seriously, is this something to be concerned about? I
No.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000, Ramiro Amaya wrote:
I am new in this mail list, so I do not have so much experience about the
questions I should ask, If I am in the worng place let me know, please.
Well my question is related with Solaris 2.6, the story is like this:
What does this have to do with
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ramiro Amaya wrote:
I am new in this mail list, so I do not have so much experience about the
questions I should ask, If I am in the worng place let me know, please.
Well my question is related with Solaris 2.6, the story is like this:
I have a Solaris 2.5 server
This list is for FreeBSD, not Solaris.
*==*
*Gene Harris http://www.tetronsoftware.com*
*FreeBSD Novice*
*All ORBS.org SMTP connections are denied! *
*==*
On Thu, 13
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 07:22:19AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way
how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemented http and ftp URL
fetching and thus eliminated the need for a fetch(1) command.
Couldn't the FreeBSD ftp(1)
On Sun 1999-10-03 (07:22), Matthias Buelow wrote:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: FTP directory listing with ftpio(3) and fetch(3)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way
how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemented http
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Anders Vidmark wrote:
Hi
Hej, :-)
Im getting unreferenced inodes that fills up /.
The box is running freebsd 2.2.6-release and sendmail 8.8.8
Sendmails databases are rebuilt once every half hour.
It seems like the unref. inodes comes from spammers.db and
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Anders Vidmark wrote:
Hi
Hej, :-)
Im getting unreferenced inodes that fills up /.
The box is running freebsd 2.2.6-release and sendmail 8.8.8
Sendmails databases are rebuilt once every half hour.
It seems like the unref. inodes comes from spammers.db and
33 matches
Mail list logo
