Roman Divacky freebsd.org!rdiva...@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to
GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ...
... it's invalid code to have
* per...@pluto.rain.com per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding?
And all applications that use mp.h.
--
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpwD14uSm0Hj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
* per...@pluto.rain.com per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding?
And all applications that use mp.h.
which is a nonsense... please move forward
By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to
GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ...
... it's invalid code to have a function named pow()
in a hosted environment which is not /The/ pow().
^^^
I don't suppose LLVM supports a
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to
GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ...
... it's invalid code to have a function named pow()
in a hosted environment which is not
Hello all,
As you may have read some days ago, work has started to make the FreeBSD
base system compile better with clang, the BSD licensed C compiler from
the LLVM project.
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello all,
As you may have read some days ago, work has started to make the FreeBSD
base system compile better with clang, the BSD licensed C compiler from
the LLVM project.
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some
* Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why don't you add symbol versioning to libmp, so that old
binaries will still work, but new ones will get the new
symbols by default. Hmm, will that work without bumping
SHLIB_MAJOR? You might want to play around with it and
see.
Well, even
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why don't you add symbol versioning to libmp, so that old
binaries will still work, but new ones will get the new
symbols by default. Hmm, will that work without bumping
SHLIB_MAJOR? You might want to play
* Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, as long as you're in there, maybe you should add
symbol versioning anyway, even after a library version
bump. Seems like it would be easy since there aren't
that many symbols.
I assume I should just mark all symbols with version FBSD_1.1? If
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv, newkey, chkey, libtelnet)
won't compile, because a library they depend (libmp)on has a function
called pow(). By default, LLVM has a
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv, newkey, chkey, libtelnet)
won't compile, because a library they depend (libmp)on has a function
called pow(). By
Christoph Mallon schrieb:
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv, newkey, chkey, libtelnet)
won't compile, because a library they depend (libmp)on has
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, as long as you're in there, maybe you should add
symbol versioning anyway, even after a library version
bump. Seems like it would be easy since there aren't
that many symbols.
I assume I should just
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Christoph Mallon wrote:
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv, newkey, chkey, libtelnet)
won't compile, because a library they
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Christoph Mallon wrote:
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Ed Schouten wrote:
One of the reasons why we can't compile the base system yet, is because
some applications in the base system (keyserv, newkey, chkey, libtelnet)
won't compile,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Christoph Mallon wrote:
David Schultz schrieb:
As for gcc's math builtins, most of them are buggy. They fail to
respect the dynamic rounding mode, fail to generate exceptions
where appropriate, fail to respect FENV_ACCESS and other pragmas,
etc. Also, the complex
David Schultz schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Christoph Mallon wrote:
David Schultz schrieb:
As for gcc's math builtins, most of them are buggy. They fail to
respect the dynamic rounding mode, fail to generate exceptions
where appropriate, fail to respect FENV_ACCESS and other pragmas,
etc.
18 matches
Mail list logo
