On 07/10/2012 00:28, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I suspect that dnsmasq is a lot better tool for that job than BIND
I think "better" is in the eye of the beholder, particularly whether or
not the "O" is either small or well-staffed enough to pre-enter
hostnames into the zone files. That said, dnsmasq is a
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:12:16 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 19:46, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > As I see it, FreeBSD systems fall roughly into 3 categories:
> > 1) Client systems that need to lookup external DNS servers only.
> > 2) SOHO systems that primarily do external lookups but need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/2012 19:46, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Firstly, I should note that I'm not against removing bind from base.
Thanks for clarifying.
> I'm merely saying that users are going to need some guidance during
> the transition.
I've never argued agains
Firstly, I should note that I'm not against removing bind from base.
I'm merely saying that users are going to need some guidance during
the transition.
On 2012-Jul-09 13:52:15 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>On 07/09/2012 13:47, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2012-Jul-09 14:15:13 +0200, in freebsd-securit
4 matches
Mail list logo
