Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Schultz wrote:
> > Aah...we'd better put uucp back in the base system, then. Never mind
> > that it might have security problems that we don't know about. :P
>
> I can guarantee you that having a computer booted has security
> problems that
David Schultz wrote:
> Aah...we'd better put uucp back in the base system, then. Never mind
> that it might have security problems that we don't know about. :P
I can guarantee you that having a computer booted has security
problems that we don't know about, so the logical thing to do,
from that
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > It really pissed me off when the AHA-1742 support dropped out when CAM
> > came in, but that, at least, was understandable, since it was a trade:
> > something deisrable for something less desirable to the majority of
> > use
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The entire idea of "bit rot" is really "the code did not keep
> ``up to date'' with my changes, which broke the code", which
> is really a ridiculous position.
>
> It really pissed me off when the AHA-1742 support dropped out
> when CAM came in, but
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> It really pissed me off when the AHA-1742 support dropped out when CAM
> came in, but that, at least, was understandable, since it was a trade:
> something deisrable for something less desirable to the majority of
> users.
AHA-1742 works again now.
May
Jochem Kossen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2002 16:54, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > Jochem Kossen wrote:
> > > Because things evolve? :)
> >
> > You say "evolve." I say "get broken."
>
> Don't tell me that in 11 years, defaults never change
When the routing code was changed, back in the mid 1990's,
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 16:54, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> Jochem Kossen wrote:
> > Because things evolve? :)
>
> You say "evolve." I say "get broken."
Don't tell me that in 11 years, defaults never change
> > > How do I know which man page to read?
> >
> > You start X with startx, seems obvious to
Jochem Kossen wrote:
> Because things evolve? :)
You say "evolve." I say "get broken."
> > How do I know which man page to read?
> You start X with startx, seems obvious to me. The disabling of tcp
> connections only applies to startx
It's not obvious when one has been starting X with the sam
8 matches
Mail list logo
