Re: The right way to build a new world WAS: 4.3-BETA world crashin g 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-23 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:01:16PM -0700, Matt Simerson wrote: OK, let's approach this from a little different angle: Below is the appropriate entries from /usr/src/UPDATING on a FreeBSD 4-stable machine. As of 2/2/2001, the most correct and safest method for updating your FreeBSD machine

Re: The right way to build a new world WAS: 4.3-BETA world crashin g 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message 8D18712B2604D411A6BB009027F6449801B4B544@0SEA01EXSRV1 "Matt Simerson" writes: : I have found that there IS a variety of reasons NOT to do it that way. The : most obvious is that you might not have console access, thus making it : pretty hard to access the machine while it's in single

Re: The right way to build a new world WAS: 4.3-BETA world crashin g 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote: You'll also get better milage out of make -j N (say 3 or 4) and doing things sequentially. It is safer and runs just as fast. Dunno if it was a temporary compile problem, but I've actually found that: make -j 3 buildkernel hasn't worked properly

Re: The right way to build a new world WAS: 4.3-BETA world crashin g 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?

2001-03-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Watson writes: : On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote: : : You'll also get better milage out of make -j N (say 3 or 4) and doing : things sequentially. It is safer and runs just as fast. : : Dunno if it was a temporary compile problem, but I've