Arun Sharma writes:
>
> For Intel processors, CPUID instruction spits out both L1 and L2 cache
> sizes. Perhaps, these things should be made a runtime option than a
> compile time option ?
That sounds like a good idea.
Also, I imagine that it would be possible to write a function to
emperi
Alright, well that makes sense.. I guess it speeds things up some too? (I
had it enabled for a while, but didn't notice a difference).
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade|
| Unix Systems Administrator
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 12:50:41PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> Just curious because I have no experience in this area... but what exactly
> does cache coloring get us... I've never actually gotten a really straight
> answer on this... Thanks
Read Curt Schimmel's book UNIX systems for mod
Just curious because I have no experience in this area... but what exactly
does cache coloring get us... I've never actually gotten a really straight
answer on this... Thanks
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT up
[This message has also been posted.]
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:42:35 +0100, Koster, K.J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > currently -> candidate
> > > > PQ_HUGECACHE PQ_CACHE1024
> > > > PQ_LARGECACHE PQ_CACHE512
> > > > PQ_MEDIUMCACHEPQ_CACHE256
> > > > PQ_NO
>
> > > currently -> candidate
> > > PQ_HUGECACHE PQ_CACHE1024
> > > PQ_LARGECACHE PQ_CACHE512
> > > PQ_MEDIUMCACHEPQ_CACHE256
> > > PQ_NORMALCACHEPQ_CACHE64
>
Hmm. At boot time, the BIOS displayes this square box with a lot of grub in
it that FreeBSD th
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> > currently -> candidate
> > PQ_HUGECACHE PQ_CACHE1024
> > PQ_LARGECACHE PQ_CACHE512
> > PQ_MEDIUMCACHEPQ_CACHE256
> > PQ_NORMALCACHEPQ_CACHE64
> >
> > and newly PQ_CACHE128 should be defined as
:> PQ_HUGECACHE PQ_CACHE1024
:> PQ_LARGECACHE PQ_CACHE512
:> PQ_MEDIUMCACHEPQ_CACHE256
:> PQ_NORMALCACHEPQ_CACHE64
:>
:> and newly PQ_CACHE128 should be defined as default.
:>
:> Any ideas?
:
:Sounds ok to me. Do you have any patches for this? I
At Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT),
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds ok to me. Do you have any patches for this? If not,
> I'll make some and see if they pass muster.
I have no patches. I would put it in your hands.
Thank you.
--
Motomichi Matsuzaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 25-Jun-00 Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> ** this discussion is for i386 architectures **
>
> I think there is some unclearness on the description
> about VM subsystem coloring in NOTES (formerly called LINT).
>
> Currently,
>
># Options for the VM subsystem
>#optionsPQ_NO
Hi.
** this discussion is for i386 architectures **
I think there is some unclearness on the description
about VM subsystem coloring in NOTES (formerly called LINT).
Currently,
# Options for the VM subsystem
#optionsPQ_NOOPT# No coloring
options PQ_LARGECACHE
11 matches
Mail list logo