On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15:26AM -0400, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> Bob Bishop wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> >
> >>I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
> >>box. [etc]
> >
pyright
> problem with that?
Sorry I missed the first email or two and didnt realise you were trying
the latest from the intel site.
Intel (well an intel employee but as part of his day job from what I
understand from his posts,) maintains the driver in the source tree.
The last I remember him
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> Matthew Hagerty wrote:
>> Bob Bishop wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-
Chris Ruiz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Matthew Hagerty wrote:
Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
box. [etc]
Yo
Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Matthew Hagerty wrote:
Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
box. [etc]
You may need to turn WoL on in the BIOS, have a look in the same
Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> Bob Bishop wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
>>> box. [etc]
>>
>> You may need to turn WoL on in the B
Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
box. [etc]
You may need to turn WoL on in the BIOS, have a look in the same place
as the LAN boot settings.
--
Bob Bishop
r...@gid.co.uk
I gu
Hi,
On 11 Aug 2009, at 04:55, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release
box. [etc]
You may need to turn WoL on in the BIOS, have a look in the same place
as the LAN boot settings.
--
Bob Bishop
r...@gid.
Greetings,
I'm trying to get the Wake on Lan feature working on a 7.2-release box.
I have two Intel NIC's, a Pro/100 and Pro/1000 (82541PI). The Pro/100
worked great right from the start using the generic kernel and was
detected by the fxp driver. Using the wol (from ports) on a
Quoting Remko Lodder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 29 Nov 2007
07:19:36 +0100 (CET)):
On Thu, November 29, 2007 12:01 am, Stefan Sperling wrote:
OK, I've created an account in the wiki.
My login is StefanSperling
Thanks :)
I added you to the list.
I created http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wa
Quoting Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>flags=
> mtu 1500
>
> Would that be better?
IMHO, too much info packed in here, making reading difficult.
> Has anyone got better ideas?
What if there was a single line added, right after status for instance:
wol: (magic) unicast link multicast
will wake on: magic
Adding two new lines of output for a minor feature like that
is indeed overkill.
Actually I have been thinking about this for a while.
Maybe the WOL information should somehow be integrated
into interface flags? There would be quite a few wake on lan
options to be squeezed i
On Thu, November 29, 2007 12:01 am, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:57:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> > Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
>> > Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
>> > I create
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:57:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
> > Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
> > I created an account there and someone added me to the
> > ContributorsGroup fo
o [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or via send-pr &
> > suggest it be swallowed as an Annex to main docs ? Seems useful.
>
> I guess the wiki would be more appropriate than the main docs.
>
> Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
> Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki i
propriate than the main docs.
Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
I created an account there and someone added me to the
ContributorsGroup for a new WakeOnLan page I would be good to go.
Another place I could add it to is th
Annex to main docs ? Seems useful.
>
> I guess the wiki would be more appropriate than the main docs.
>
> Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
> Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
> I created an account there and someone added me to the
> C
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:28:24AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> I really want to see the WOL support get into the tree.
Cool.
> I looked at it
> before and had some issues with ifconfig integration which is mostly why
> it's not already there.
You mean you are hacking on it as well (independent
than the main docs.
Maybe we should add a wiki page about wake on lan?
Reading http://wiki.freebsd.org/AboutWiki it seems that if
I created an account there and someone added me to the
ContributorsGroup for a new WakeOnLan page I would be good to go.
Another place I could add it to is the wake on
> Well, I hope I haven't missed anything important, but I guess
> that's about it.
Wow ! seems like you spent a fair time assembling that lot,
& it'd sure be a shame if it just got dusty in mail archives,
(OK apart from current readers who might latch it).
Maybe you could send it to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:48:50PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Using the NatSemi card an example, there is a 32bit WOL configuration
> register at offset 0x40 in the chip register space and bit number 9
> (the 8th bit from the right)
As usual I got the numbers wrong :)
Sorry if this is causin
n the web and has a very good section on configuring wake on lan:
http://www.national.com/ds/DP/DP83815.pdf
Look at page 90 in that PDF. Even if your chip is different the general
procedure is likely the same on most chips so this serves as a good
example (along with a working implementatio
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:45:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I usually use either if_em or if_xl chipsets, so I hoped landing this code
> > in at least -CURRENT (should go there first, I guess) would result in more
> > chipsets supported ;)
>
> There is code
a home server,
> both of them really do not need to be on all the time, but I want to be able
> to reach them when I need a file from them when I'm elsewhere.
Yes, wake on lan, if used properly, makes computers a bit more
friendly to the environment :-)
> I usually use either i
one
or two people who sent me a quick thank you note :)
So I have no idea how many people are actually using the patch.
I know that:
* if_sis and if_vr wake on lan support is very stable for me.
I've been using this code for nearly 2 years now.
* if_nve support has a
me a quick thank you note :)
So I have no idea how many people are actually using the patch.
I know that:
* if_sis and if_vr wake on lan support is very stable for me.
I've been using this code for nearly 2 years now.
* if_nve support has afaik never been tested (
Hello Hackers,
I have written a patch for the if_sis driver that enables
wake on lan on the NatSemi DP8381[56] network chip.
This did not work before because the driver needs to explicitely
configure the card to enter wake on lan mode on system shutdown.
I also added ioctls to make wake events
Hello,
I have written a patch that teaches the sis driver to put
the NatSemi DP83815 chip into wake on lan mode on system shutdown.
A _very_ sketchy, but working, version, that still includes debugging
related macro craft that won't be in the final version, can be found at
http://st
>
>
> To follow up on myself, it seems to work on older Asus P2B-LS
> motherboards (onboard fxp). But only after you shutdown FreeBSD via
> 'shutdown -p now'. I don't suppose anybody knows which machines
> support this well?
The machine *should* support WOL from a cold power-on. However, I d
To follow up on myself, it seems to work on older Asus P2B-LS
motherboards (onboard fxp). But only after you shutdown FreeBSD via
'shutdown -p now'. I don't suppose anybody knows which machines
support this well?
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-h
Peter Dufault writes:
> >
> > Can somebody clue me in on how Wake On Lan is supposed to work?
> > Does it require any support at all from the OS, or is it totally a
> > BIOS thing?
>
> I don't know how "Wake On Lan" is supposed to work, but t
>
> Can somebody clue me in on how Wake On Lan is supposed to work?
> Does it require any support at all from the OS, or is it totally a
> BIOS thing?
I don't know how "Wake On Lan" is supposed to work, but the "Sony Vaio
Slimtop" I have comes out of susp
Can somebody clue me in on how Wake On Lan is supposed to work?
Does it require any support at all from the OS, or is it totally a
BIOS thing?
I've built the wake-on-lan program submitted via
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=23151 and, although it
seems to work to bring W2K box o
33 matches
Mail list logo
