On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Joe McGuckin wrote:
> Is one preferable?
Here's the history:
BSD ncr -> Linux ncr53c8xx -> Linux sym53c8xx -> FreeBSD sym
The ncr is minimally maintained mainly against O/S changes since the
latest real improvement that has been the support of 875/895/896 Ultra
chips:
-
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:16:55PM -0700, Joe McGuckin wrote:
>
> Is one preferable?
sym. Gerard did an excellent job in this driver. Sym is the most activily
maintained driver as well. ncr always worked fine for me as well, don't
misunderstand, but the future belongs to sym ;-)
--
Wilko Bult
sym is actively maintained, ncr isn't really.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe McGuckin writes:
> : Is one preferable?
>
> sym is generally preferable to ncr.
>
> Warner
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe fre
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe McGuckin writes:
: Is one preferable?
sym is generally preferable to ncr.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Is one preferable?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
994 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: 650-969-2203
Cell: 650-207-0372
Fax: 650-969-2124
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
5 matches
Mail list logo