A couple of months ago, I saw a note on daemonnews that there was a
patch for a proportional share scheduler. When would this work better
than the existing priority feedback scheduler?
NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks.
jm
--
My other computer is your windows box.
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
A couple of months ago, I saw a note on daemonnews that there was a
patch for a proportional share scheduler. When would this work better
than the existing priority feedback scheduler?
NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks.
Basically, you
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:17:28AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
| Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
| A couple of months ago, I saw a note on daemonnews that there was a
| patch for a proportional share scheduler. When would this work better
| than the existing priority feedback scheduler?
|
|
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
| thrashing, but the result was that the X server had sufficiently
| good interactive response to fullfill the move mouse - wiggle
| cursor requirement amd avoid cognitive dissonance on the part
| of the user attached to the mouse. 8-).
Why don't they just add an
| Why don't they just add an extra CPU to handle the GUI?? ;-)
|
| They did. 4.0.2 was the ES/MP (Enhanced Security/Multi Processing)
I thought only NT-SMP did that. I *thought* I was being funny. :-)
| Not really. A lot of them are rehashing things we've known
| for a long time, and
Sorry, my last email was sent prematurely. I hit 'send' a bit too
soon.
| Why don't they just add an extra CPU to handle the GUI?? ;-)
|
| They did. 4.0.2 was the ES/MP (Enhanced Security/Multi Processing)
I thought only NT did that. I was *trying* to be funny. :-)
| Not really. A
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 07:35, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
| Why don't they just add an extra CPU to handle the GUI?? ;-)
|
| They did. 4.0.2 was the ES/MP (Enhanced Security/Multi Processing)
I thought only NT-SMP did that. I *thought* I was being funny. :-)
SVR4.2 is a totally threaded
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 07:39:35AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 07:35, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
| | Why don't they just add an extra CPU to handle the GUI?? ;-)
| |
| | They did. 4.0.2 was the ES/MP (Enhanced Security/Multi Processing)
|
| I thought only NT-SMP
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 12:11, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 07:39:35AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 07:35, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
| | Why don't they just add an extra CPU to handle the GUI?? ;-)
| |
| | They did. 4.0.2 was the ES/MP
| OIC. Just trying to get more information out.
Still appreciated.
I just didn't want my joke to *totally* go to waste, pathetic though
it was. :-)
jm
--
My other computer is your Windows box.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
10 matches
Mail list logo