Hi folks,
Why are include files installed using -C instead of -c? This makes it
harder to find stale includes.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:06:22 +0100, David Malone wrote:
If you changed the date on header files which hadn't changed then
next time you typed make on a project with carfully set up dependencies
everything would end up getting recompiled.
That's certainly something one could argue as a
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:17:05 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
In that case, I'd really like to make this behaviour in the build
optional so that it's easy for FreeBSD developers to easily identify
stale includes.
Perhaps I could replace all instances of the -C option to install(8)
with
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:18:56 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hell, we already have COPY, we're just not using it. I'll submit
patches for review to the appropriate lists.
Hmmm. After a little more investigation, it seems I just need CLOBBER
support, which was removed from Makefile.inc1 in rev
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sheldon Hearn writes:
:
:
: On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:48:36 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
:
: : Why are include files installed using -C instead of -c? This makes it
: : harder to find stale includes.
:
: I've wanted to have a /etc/mtree/bsd.obsolete for a long time
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:58:02 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
The reason I'd like to see it isn't so that make world kills things
automatically, but so that I could kill them (or at least find out
what should be killed) on systems that had FreeBSD 1.0 installed on
them, then upgraded, disk cloned,
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:48:36 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
: Why are include files installed using -C instead of -c? This makes it
: harder to find stale includes.
I've wanted to have a /etc/mtree/bsd.obsolete for a long time now...
That would make me too nervous. All I really want is the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sheldon Hearn writes:
: Why are include files installed using -C instead of -c? This makes it
: harder to find stale includes.
I've wanted to have a /etc/mtree/bsd.obsolete for a long time now...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:43:35PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Why are include files installed using -C instead of -c? This makes it
harder to find stale includes.
If you changed the date on header files which hadn't changed then
next time you typed make on a project with carfully set up
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:58:02 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
The reason I'd like to see it isn't so that make world kills things
automatically, but so that I could kill them (or at least find out
what should be killed) on systems
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:58:02 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
The reason I'd like to see it isn't so that make world kills things
automatically, but so that I could kill them (or at least find out
what should be killed) on systems that had FreeBSD 1.0 installed on
them, then upgraded, disk
11 matches
Mail list logo
