Catching up on mail after a couple of weeks with the flue.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:13:46 -0800
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> - The one caveat to cvsup/csup that's awesome is its componentization
> capability, i.e. being able to selectively download components in src
> / ports; I'm not 100% sure but
On 01/26/2011 12:00, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Alex
order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
however (except 'make update' maybe).
Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
grep CVS /usr/src/release/Makefile
A) The fact th
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Alex
>> order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
>> however (except 'make update' maybe).
>
> Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
> grep CVS /usr/src/release/M
Hi,
Alex
> order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
> however (except 'make update' maybe).
Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
grep CVS /usr/src/release/Makefile
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (24/01/2011 11:33), Alexander Best wrote:
>> On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> > > On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen"
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>Perhaps we s
On (24/01/2011 11:33), Alexander Best wrote:
> On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen"
> > > wrote:
> > >>Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of
> > >>cvs
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:05:17PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Jan 25 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > >Diane Bruce wrote:
> > >> There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
> > >> into base for ex
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:40:50PM +0100, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >Diane Bruce wrote:
> >> There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
> >> into base for example.
> >
> > Completely apart from licensing, an
On Tue Jan 25 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >Diane Bruce wrote:
> >> There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
> >> into base for example.
> >
> > Completely apart from licensing, another strike against mer
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>Diane Bruce wrote:
>> There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
>> into base for example.
>
> Completely apart from licensing, another strike against mercurial is
> that it is written in Python, so it couldn'
Hi. This is good topic. I am no body. But I want to mention things.
I've use RCS, CVS, SVN, Hg and Git. To me, first three are really
much one in same. Of later two still learning, Hg can be slightly
easier, but Git has simple analogs too, not much hard to get. We
all learn new thing. But overall,
On 25 January 2011 11:22, wrote:
> Diane Bruce wrote:
>
>> There certainly would not be a chance of putting
>> mercurial or git into base for example.
>
> Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
> mercurial is that it is written in Python, so it couldn't
> go into base unless Pyt
Diane Bruce wrote:
> There certainly would not be a chance of putting
> mercurial or git into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
mercurial is that it is written in Python, so it couldn't
go into base unless Python also went into base.
BTW this topic came u
Regardless of the benefits, unless there's someone to setup the
infrastructure to run things, we're not going to change.
We should at least have a master seed for git that people can pull from
before we talk about doing anything further. git has the ability to
pull from svn, so this should be
> They both support pretty much the same feature set; here's a cute but
> dated comparison:
>
> http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/git-vs-mercurial/
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VersionControl
Table of features comparing SVN HG GIT MTN
http://wiki.freebsd.org/
section De
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:12:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >> On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce wrote:
> >>
...
> But we don't compile CVS, SVN, etc into our sourc
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce wrote:
>>
>> > As long as it is not GPL.
>>
>> Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
>
> IRL I'm known to be
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce wrote:
>
> > As long as it is not GPL.
>
> Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
IRL I'm known to be very dry humoured, I am deadly in e-mail or IRC.
> requiremen
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce wrote:
> As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
requirement. Of the major SCMs, only Subversion is non-GPL-ed (even
CVS is...).
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.o
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >>On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen"
> >>wrote:
> >>>Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen"
>>> wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
instead if that makes it more useful?
Can cvsup-master stil
On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" wrote:
> >>Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of
> >>cvsup-master instead if that makes it more useful?
> >
> > Can cv
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" wrote:
>>Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
>>instead if that makes it more useful?
>
> Can cvsup-master still lose atomicity of commits? I suspe
24 matches
Mail list logo
