Catching up on mail after a couple of weeks with the flue.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:13:46 -0800
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
- The one caveat to cvsup/csup that's awesome is its componentization
capability, i.e. being able to selectively download components in src
/ ports; I'm
On 01/26/2011 12:00, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Alex
order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
however (except 'make update' maybe).
Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
grep CVS /usr/src/release/Makefile
A) The fact
Hi,
Alex
order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
however (except 'make update' maybe).
Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
grep CVS /usr/src/release/Makefile
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi,
Alex
order to build the system. the VCS however is not part of the build toolchain
however (except 'make update' maybe).
Some good points, but also remember make release also uses cvs
grep CVS
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting
mercurial or git into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
mercurial is that it is written in Python, so it couldn't
go into base unless Python also went into base.
BTW this
On 25 January 2011 11:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting
mercurial or git into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
mercurial is that it is written in Python, so it couldn't
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing, another strike against mercurial is
that it is written in Python, so it
On Tue Jan 25 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing, another strike against
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:40:50PM +0100, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
into base for example.
Completely apart from licensing,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:05:17PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Jan 25 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:22:34 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
There certainly would not be a chance of putting mercurial or git
into base for
On (24/01/2011 11:33), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@nitro.dk
wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On (24/01/2011 11:33), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
instead if that makes it more useful?
Can cvsup-master still lose
On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of
cvsup-master instead if that makes it more
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
instead if that makes it more
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk
wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk
wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
requirement. Of the major SCMs, only Subversion is non-GPL-ed (even
CVS is...).
___
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
IRL I'm known to be very dry humoured, I am deadly in e-mail or IRC.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
IRL I'm
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:12:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
...
But we don't compile CVS, SVN, etc
They both support pretty much the same feature set; here's a cute but
dated comparison:
http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/git-vs-mercurial/
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VersionControl
Table of features comparing SVN HG GIT MTN
http://wiki.freebsd.org/
section
Regardless of the benefits, unless there's someone to setup the
infrastructure to run things, we're not going to change.
We should at least have a master seed for git that people can pull from
before we talk about doing anything further. git has the ability to
pull from svn, so this should
23 matches
Mail list logo
