Matthew Dillon wrote:
One of the reasons I would like to see an actual 'ps axl' output
during one of these heavy paging periods rather then someone's analysis
of the output, is to check things like this.
Don't look at me. After half an hour waiting, all I had managed to was
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
One of the reasons I would like to see an actual 'ps axl' output
during one of these heavy paging periods rather then someone's analysis
of the output, is to check things like this.
Don't look at me. After half an hour
: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 12:43 PM
To: Daniel C. Sobral
Cc: Matthew Dillon; David Gilbert; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Worst case swapping.
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
One of the reasons I would like to see an actual 'ps axl' output
during one of these heavy paging
Julian Elischer wrote:
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
One of the reasons I would like to see an actual 'ps axl' output
during one of these heavy paging periods rather then someone's analysis
of the output, is to check things like this.
Don't look
:
:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
: One of the reasons I would like to see an actual 'ps axl' output
: during one of these heavy paging periods rather then someone's analysis
: of the output, is to check things like this.
:
:Don't look at me. After half an hour waiting, all I had managed
"Matthew" == Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew :Believe me, I look at these things. Yes there is a lot
Matthew going on and a :lot using memory. I normally have about
Matthew 20% to 25% of my Gig of swap :used... meaning that I have
Matthew allocated roughly
David Gilbert wrote:
I'm positive that its not a case of the working set being larger than
physical memory; it's one of choice of page to swap.
You are positively wrong, then. :-) Active pages are _always_ last
resort with the algorithm FreeBSD uses.
You mention Netscape is the only active
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 04:40:48AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
David Gilbert wrote:
I'm positive that its not a case of the working set being larger than
physical memory; it's one of choice of page to swap.
You are positively wrong, then. :-) Active pages are _always_ last
resort
:David Gilbert wrote:
:
: I'm positive that its not a case of the working set being larger than
: physical memory; it's one of choice of page to swap.
:
:You are positively wrong, then. :-) Active pages are _always_ last
:resort with the algorithm FreeBSD uses.
:
:You mention Netscape is the
I'm running a 700Mhz K7 with 256M of RAM as my workstation. I have
two fast SCSI drives with a Gig of swap between them. The system
shouldn't normally be a bottleneck as a workstation.
I find, however, that there seem to be some bad worst-case senerios
popping up rather often.
Netscape is a
:I'm running a 700Mhz K7 with 256M of RAM as my workstation. I have
:two fast SCSI drives with a Gig of swap between them. The system
:shouldn't normally be a bottleneck as a workstation.
:
:I find, however, that there seem to be some bad worst-case senerios
:popping up rather often.
:...
"Matthew" == Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew :Now the application in question (Netscape) usually runs
Matthew around 50 to :75 megs, so that swapping activity is
Matthew effectively swapping an amount
Matthew 50-75MB is a lot, but if you have 256MB of ram it can't
Matthew
:Believe me, I look at these things. Yes there is a lot going on and a
:lot using memory. I normally have about 20% to 25% of my Gig of swap
:used... meaning that I have allocated roughly double my RAM in
:applications.
:
:And when this worst-case happens, memory is full... but the only
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Believe me, I look at these things. Yes there is a lot going on and a
:lot using memory. I normally have about 20% to 25% of my Gig of swap
:used... meaning that I have allocated roughly double my RAM in
:applications.
:
:And when this worst-case happens, memory
Kent Stewart drunkenly mumbled...
Netscape reallys goes to pot in a hurry if you allow it to use more
than 1-2MB of memory cache. A friend was seeing a terrible response
and tracked it back to Netscape's memory cache. He had a lot of memory
and started out with something on the order of
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Brian Hechinger wrote:
:Kent Stewart drunkenly mumbled...
:
: Netscape reallys goes to pot in a hurry if you allow it to use more
: than 1-2MB of memory cache. A friend was seeing a terrible response
: and tracked it back to Netscape's memory cache. He had a lot of memory
:
16 matches
Mail list logo
