Re: add some constraints in cpufunc.h

2001-11-29 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:38:35AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: On 21-Nov-01 David Xu wrote: 4.4-stable, file sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h, --- cpufunc.h.orig Wed Nov 21 13:35:36 2001 +++ cpufunc.h Wed Nov 21 15:00:12 2001 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ { u_int result; -

Re: add some constraints in cpufunc.h

2001-11-29 Thread John Baldwin
On 29-Nov-01 Peter Pentchev wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:38:35AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: On 21-Nov-01 David Xu wrote: 4.4-stable, file sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h, --- cpufunc.h.orig Wed Nov 21 13:35:36 2001 +++ cpufunc.h Wed Nov 21 15:00:12 2001 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@

Re: add some constraints in cpufunc.h

2001-11-26 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Nov-01 David Xu wrote: According to GCC manual of inline assembler instruction, it says if your instruction changes condition code register(on X86, it's cpu flag register, and a simple addl instruction can affect it), you'd put cc there, I have reviewed some source header files

Re: add some constraints in cpufunc.h

2001-11-22 Thread David Xu
- From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 3:38 AM Subject: RE: add some constraints in cpufunc.h On 21-Nov-01 David Xu wrote: 4.4-stable, file sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h, --- cpufunc.h.orig Wed Nov 21

add some constraints in cpufunc.h

2001-11-21 Thread David Xu
4.4-stable, file sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h, --- cpufunc.h.orig Wed Nov 21 13:35:36 2001 +++ cpufunc.h Wed Nov 21 15:00:12 2001 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ { u_int result; - __asm __volatile(bsfl %0,%0 : =r (result) : 0 (mask)); + __asm __volatile(bsfl %0,%0 : =r (result)