Hello (again)!
I would kindly request explanation on how are cdevsw_add and
make_dev related ? Maybe short example also with focus on
cdevsw_add. Thing is i do not understand the function of
cdevsw_add when i have make_dev.
Also if there is any real good document that describes most
of cdev
Hello!
I would kindly request explanation on how are cdevsw_add and
make_dev related ? Maybe short example also with focus on
cdevsw_add. Thing is i do not understand the function of
cdevsw_add when i have make_dev.
Also if there is any real good document that describes most
of cdev related
While on the topic: Who is working on devfs and why not?
I'd like to know whether there is some interest in getting that work
underway again. More than interested to help.
You're forgetting that devsw[] is another stopgap. The kernel should
probably use something like devfs, where dev_t's
In message pine.gso.3.95q.990605103111.15420k-100...@elect8, Nick Hibma
writes:
While on the topic: Who is working on devfs and why not?
I'd like to know whether there is some interest in getting that work
underway again. More than interested to help.
I'm not currently working on devfs, but I
While on the topic: Who is working on devfs and why not?
I'm not currently working on devfs, but I am building the infrastructure
it should be based on in the kernel.
Anymore information available on where you are with this?
Cheers,
Nick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
In message pine.gso.3.95q.990605113837.15420q-100...@elect8, Nick Hibma
writes:
While on the topic: Who is working on devfs and why not?
I'm not currently working on devfs, but I am building the infrastructure
it should be based on in the kernel.
Anymore information available on where
On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message pine.gso.3.95q.990605113837.15420q-100...@elect8, Nick Hibma
writes:
While on the topic: Who is working on devfs and why not?
I'm not currently working on devfs, but I am building the infrastructure
it should be based on
Basically I'm not working on devfs at the moment since the bit that made
it workable was ripped out with extreme prejudice by someone. I'm still
absolutly convinced that a dynamic device registration and export
framework is required in the long run, but I'm not fussed if it's based on
the current
8 matches
Mail list logo