On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:32:25 +0300
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:09:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:32:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:09:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:09:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:11:31PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:11:31PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:08:08PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:04:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kib,
In-Reply-To:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:11:31PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:08:08PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:04:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:09:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:11:31PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:08:08PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kib,
In-Reply-To: 20100629083901.gg13...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:39:01AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:08:08PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:04:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kib,
In-Reply-To: 20100629083901.gg13...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:04:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kib,
In-Reply-To: 20100629083901.gg13...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:39:01AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010
Hi Kib,
In-Reply-To: 20100629083901.gg13...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:39:01AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:48:59PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:48:59PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:09:59PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kostik,
This patch seems to have faded out from memory. Is it possible to go
forward
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:48:59PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:09:59PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kostik,
This patch seems to have faded out from memory. Is it possible to go
forward and commit it?
I refreshed the patch. Hopefully, nobody will object,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:09:59PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Kostik,
This patch seems to have faded out from memory. Is it possible to go
forward and commit it?
I refreshed the patch. Hopefully, nobody will object, and I commit it
shortly.
Thanks,
Regards.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009
Hi Kostik,
This patch seems to have faded out from memory. Is it possible to go
forward and commit it?
Thanks,
Regards.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:29:16AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Below is the prototype that seems to work for me both with patched and
old rtld on i386. Patch also
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:29:16 +0300
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Below is the prototype that seems to work for me both with patched and
old rtld on i386. Patch also contains bits for amd64 that I did not
tested yet. All other arches are not buildable for now.
[patch deleted]
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:01:54PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:29:16 +0300
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Below is the prototype that seems to work for me both with patched and
old rtld on i386. Patch also contains bits for amd64 that I did not
tested
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
We probably could. I think I discussed this with Robert Watson some time
ago and we could use things like ELF hints. But still, that doesn't
prevent us from reaching this limitation later on.
Can
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
We probably could. I think I discussed this with Robert Watson some time
ago and we could use things like ELF hints. But still,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
We probably could. I think I discussed this with Robert
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
We
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:13PM +0200, Ed
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:56:49PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sorry for the late reply.
On
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:56:49PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Ed,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 03:49:53PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:56:49PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:18:42AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri,
* John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, in theory a bunch of small requests to SYSCTL_PROC() nodes that used
sysctl_wire_old() (or whatever it is called) could cause the amount of user
memory wired for sysctls to grow unbounded. Thus, allowing this limited
concurrency is a tradeoff as
On Thursday 14 May 2009 5:34:26 pm Ed Schouten wrote:
* John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, in theory a bunch of small requests to SYSCTL_PROC() nodes that
used
sysctl_wire_old() (or whatever it is called) could cause the amount of
user
memory wired for sysctls to grow unbounded.
On Friday 08 May 2009 5:41:17 pm Ed Schouten wrote:
A solution would be to solve it as follows:
- Use a semaphore, initialized to some insane high value to put an upper
limit on the amount of concurrent sysctl calls. I'm not sure whether
this is really needed. Maybe this issue is not as
John,
Thank you for your input on this matter, I'm excited to write
some software for this project since its given me great code to learn
from as i've grown up (still a kid though :). My questions are a bit
more detailed below.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:24 PM, John Baldwin
On Monday 11 May 2009 2:27:48 pm j...@0xabadba.be wrote:
John,
Thank you for your input on this matter, I'm excited to write
some software for this project since its given me great code to learn
from as i've grown up (still a kid though :). My questions are a bit
more detailed below.
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:41:17PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi,
* vasanth raonaik vasanth.raon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Jt,
I am a newbee in this alias. I am having a very basic question. It would be
really good if you could give me some of this information.
Could you please
Hi Lars,
* Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
Why is sysctl used to get a random number? Can't we get a different
source for it?
We probably could. I think I discussed this with Robert Watson some time
ago and we could use things like ELF hints. But still, that doesn't
prevent us from
Hi,
* vasanth raonaik vasanth.raon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Jt,
I am a newbee in this alias. I am having a very basic question. It would be
really good if you could give me some of this information.
Could you please elaborate on what is the current architecture of sysctl
implementation
Ed,
Thanks :) I'll be implementing this as discussed over the next few
months thanks for the technical detail I've been extremely busy with
finals. I will write the list with my thoughts within the next week,
sorry for the delay.
=jt
On May 8, 2009, at 17:41, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl
Hackers,
I've been using FreeBSD since a boy and now its time for me to give
back. I will be doing my final projects in university concerning
concurrency in the FreeBSD Kernel. I've been discussing with Ed@ methods of
implementing sysctl concurrently since we use sysctl quite a lot for
Hello Jt,
I am a newbee in this alias. I am having a very basic question. It would be
really good if you could give me some of this information.
Could you please elaborate on what is the current architecture of sysctl
implementation and How the concurrency would benefit us.
Thanks in advance,
35 matches
Mail list logo
