Well, following up to my own post, 3 people have reported
no problems with softupdates on their SMP machines.
One was softupdates only
2 were softupdates and vimun together.
Thanks for everyones prompt replies.
Right, back to those PicoBSD commits.
Bye
Roger
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord
Roger Hardiman wrote:
> Hi,
> I remember reading in the mailing lists how softupdates
> were unreliable on SMP 3.x and -current machines about 6-8 months
> ago.
>
> Is this all fixed now for SMP machines?
>
> I've been using softupdates on a uni-processor 3.2-stable machine
> and it works well.
I certainly hope they are working under SMP I am running
a 4-way Pentium-III xeon box using vinum and softupdates. so far it has
been a champ.
--
David Cross | email: cro...@cs.rpi.edu
Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~cross
Hi,
I remember reading in the mailing lists how softupdates
were unreliable on SMP 3.x and -current machines about 6-8 months
ago.
Is this all fixed now for SMP machines?
I've been using softupdates on a uni-processor 3.2-stable machine
and it works well. I wanted to try it on my two
SMP machines
4 matches
Mail list logo
